|
Post by donk on Aug 22, 2016 7:43:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by donk on Aug 22, 2016 8:52:17 GMT -5
Heh...he added clarification "Knowing disinformationist" why do you hate the truth CW???
|
|
|
Post by donk on Aug 23, 2016 7:08:45 GMT -5
I'm trying to figure this the fuck out...but of course Bill can never fully disclose anything, so we're left with pieces I guess he feels paints himself as awesome while pooping on Chanter: Posting pieces of an exchange with his critics is his favorite tactic. And his psychophants ever fail to eat it up, and enable that horseshit. Hey dude projecting on to another they look stupid...you look stupid AND SHADY posting "answers" to questions you don't bother to share. *SIGH* But your "intelligent" followers will lick that shit out of your hands. More important things indeed
|
|
|
Post by donk on Aug 24, 2016 7:40:28 GMT -5
Brilliant reply, sir, thank you for that. I hope that helps clear any delusions anyone has that Bill's some sort of master "chess player", anyone with a lick of sense and empathy should be able to see several moves ahead of him like CW mentions....
|
|
|
Post by donk on Sept 25, 2016 7:37:02 GMT -5
...oh shit, he made that one private??? Lame
Anyways trying to see if the damn video won't loop like Google chats has been doing with this damn iPad:
Last one I was really sick so couldn't really get into it, this time I made it til about 1am my time...seems it got wild as they got into the wee hours
|
|
|
Post by donk on Oct 28, 2016 9:28:10 GMT -5
So chanter did this one, and in the comments I questioned why he didn't Kara St. Louis about the accusations that she quit a miles conference because Max "stole her fae material"...you can still hopefully see the thread cuz my comment started it What you WON'T see...or at least I'm not able to see now...is Kara's comment complimenting the video to which I replied asking her directly about. I forget exactly what I wrote a day ago but remembered she replied that a conversation was misinterpreted, her issues with max that were personal and unrelated to her not doing the conference ...and I forget exactly what I said but my reply to that was to push for further clarification, politely and even helpfully (to my mind) suggesting she publicly set the record straight because I considered the anecdote/evidence/whatever to be a compelling support of CWs thesis within that first Max video that the whole scene is a bunch of old boys club bullshit I pointed how her deflecting/ignoring the whole thing is making her look worse. And while that's not really close to how I actually typed it is close to the gist...I can't give you exact words because she seemed to delete her comment (which deleted my replies) Hey cee-dub, you called out Shane on that one, I'm calling you out here...it doesn't seem like she herself is willing to, so please follow up on your point about the "fae material" so that there is no confusion...thanks!
|
|
|
Post by donk on Oct 28, 2016 9:31:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by donk on Oct 28, 2016 11:56:45 GMT -5
Ok I'm an idiot, it is still out there and as it's been doing since I went to ND all of my social media (YouTube, the Book, even some of the forums) seems tweaked out not letting me she sit or i been being more of an idiot than usual and just somehow missing it.
I apologize profusely to Kara and y'all for misleading you, it was not my intent and that comment and chain (though I couldn't find it at the time) was there, she did not delete the thread, and responded politely and directly to me when called out (though I haven't read it just yet, I wanted to clear the record first)
Lesson: time is your friend when you are reactionary, breathe and Slow down
|
|
|
Post by donk on Jan 22, 2017 9:46:33 GMT -5
I got involved in this one last night: Goddammit...can't get it embedded:
|
|
|
Post by donk on Jan 26, 2017 7:52:12 GMT -5
Here's me trying to clarify, but actually I think I do a better job in the comments of that last one up above in my convo with steven walsh:
What people are seeming to want to do is point what is WRONG with people that don't share their dogmatic beliefs, while ignoring the fact that they have any. Just because you believe in more "science" than the next guy does NOT mean you don't have beliefs whose dogma you live by (which is NOT necessarily the same thing, and certainly not the same thing as believing David Icke or Rupert Sheldrake or whoever.
I just think it is important to look at SIMILARITIES in things to understand why someone has a difference in their belief. And just because someone uses the empirically superior technique of applying scientific method and using impeccable verifiable sources doesn't mean they are doing so perfectly (or not even realizing when they slip)
I run into the same problem that I faced on the forums, people can't get past emotionally charged associations with ideas to look at them from a detached view...and in the process they project every problem they have with the application or abuse of the idea on to me just for having brought it up. We need to learn have adult discussions about things that challenge the dogmas we live by, we shouldn't; be so definsive and protective...rather open ourselves to hearing the reasons others have opposing points of view so that we can understand why and therefore more honestly analyze our own beliefs.
|
|
|
Post by donk on Feb 22, 2017 8:05:36 GMT -5
Ah...the inconsistencies, the paradox... of the "atheist" starting a religion. Not sure how this was recieved...didn't really know what to make of it while I was participating, but I love Ben and what he's doing, enjoy his virtual company, and glad he got so much out of it. I was energized by his energy when he "came back" www.youtube.com/shared?ci=RKW6AKmg3YIAs for the idea of "channeling", I guess I liken it to religion (which I do with everything these days I guess). There's plenty of good to get it out of it if your intentions are pure, it requires faith in "something outside of yourself" for it to make any sense...and seems bizarre to anyone on the "outside" Plus it may distract from a "common reality" more than it contributes to it...my thoughts were that at times it felt like an excuse to voice a reluctant faith in the "create your own reality" concept of "spirituality", where he allowed himself to take it further than his less-mild-mannered alter-ego would normally let him It's hard for me to understand the value he got from it, but I definitely FELT it, that he did, from his vibe in the after part. So I guess "it is what is", we'll see what I get out of watching somebody "channel an entity" next time...it's been awhile since I saw a bashar or any of the famous ones and I've never watched schlub on YouTube do it. I'm definitely MORE confused than I was going in
|
|
|
Post by donk on Mar 11, 2017 8:56:51 GMT -5
So CW took a minute, put all his videos on private in order to self reflect. He's been slowly making some videos available, and apparently is getting ready to remerge, oughta be hoot: www.youtube.com/shared?ci=pokjpPteBDYHappy trails Ben, hope you are well
|
|
|
Post by donk on Jun 14, 2017 20:49:53 GMT -5
Here's where people see CW charters "dark" side, and distanc themselves from and/or attack him for blowing Satan... or something...Ifull disclosure 'm a fan/virtual friend of special guest:
|
|
duh marmitey scorpyun
Guest
|
CW Chanter
Sept 11, 2018 16:24:44 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by duh marmitey scorpyun on Sept 11, 2018 16:24:44 GMT -5
... Dont know how i slipper into his youtube channel but whatta douche!!! Trying to debunk, trying to outsmart, but always with @-am not saying he is a bad person.." Just wanted smack this fatso in the face. *spit spit* on him.[/quote
|
|
Duh Marmitey Scorpyunn
Guest
|
CW Chanter
Sept 11, 2018 16:35:00 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Duh Marmitey Scorpyunn on Sept 11, 2018 16:35:00 GMT -5
I don't wannuh spit on him; thats taking things alittletoo far for my tastes. But i totally get where you're coming from, regarding That.
But i would like to spank him.........i think he'd enjoy a good spanking!
|
|